On due process of law, or deny

On the 7th
of June, 1892 Homer Plessy was arrested due to his refusal to move from a seat
that he had rightfully paid for. This would end up pushing the limits of what
is considered constitutional about the “Separate Car Act”. Plessy’s argument was
that his removal went against the 14th amendment, in the case “Plessy v.
Ferguson”.

By the fourteenth
amendment, all persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to
the jurisdiction thereof, are made citizens of the United States and of the
state wherein they reside; and the states are forbidden from making or enforcing
any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States, or shall deprive any person of life, liberty, or property
without due process of law, or deny to any person within their jurisdiction the
equal protection of the laws. (Transcript)

The 14th amendment may grant these rights, but the
10th overrules these by placing the court in power to decide on the constitutionality
of any problems not covered previously in the constitution. The 14th amendment
guarantees equal protection, which is the reason why this decision will harm
our beautiful country for decades to come.  Ferguson reached the conclusion that “Separate
but equal” was constitutional even though now it seems backwards and wrong. Ferguson
stated, “It the removal of Plessy from the train does not conflict with the
thirteenth amendment, which abolished slavery and involuntary servitude, except
a punishment for crime, is too clear for argument” (“Transcript”). This is one
of the statements that pushed Ferguson towards he ruling. The legalization of “Separate
but Equal” affected people during the civil rights movement in two main ways: the
image of black people compared to white people and the overall infrastructure
and economy of the U.S.

            Moreover
black people before were seen as lower classes and not as good as their pale
counter parts. Without even seeing a person’s ability, black people would be
disregarded or even purposely targeted with negative attention. With “Separate
but Equal” in place segregation spread more and more and blacks were treated
worse and worse even though the name states “Equal”. The U.S. was split into
colored and non-colored but “states had troubles determining where to draw the
line” (“Plessy v Ferguson.” History, 1:05-1:15). The white people who thought they were better before were
reassured by Ferguson that they were much better. This led to the mistreatment
of many non-white people before Brown v Board. Furthermore the ruling affected the